Actueel nieuws over effectiviteit

Dagbladadvertenties meest populair

19 juni 2008

Het Mediabelevingsonderzoek 2007 wees het al uit: dagbladadvertenties bieden de lezer nieuwe, nuttige en geloofwaardige informatie. Van alle mediumtypen irriteert dagbladreclame de mediaconsument het minst. Onderzoek door Dynamic Logic in Engeland geeft hetzelfde beeld.

Lees hier de samenvatting van de onderzoeksresultaten:

Mobile ads ‘most unpopular format’ survey

Mobile advertising is the most unpopular ad format in the UK, according to new research from Dynamic Logic. The study indicated that print advertising generates the most positive reaction with UK consumers and is seen as having the most relevance. The Dynamic Logic ‘AdReaction’ study gauged consumer’s opinions of advertising.


 
Newspaper ads top the chart with 53% of consumers considering them as “very” or “somewhat” positive.

Christina Goodman, Director of Global Marketing & Business Development, Dynamic Logic, said: “When asked about their overall attitudes towards general advertising formats, consumers feel very differently about the various media platforms. Certainly, if asked, most people will never say they would like to have more advertising in their lives. However, the results show that there are certain types of advertising that people may be more receptive towards.

”More interruptive or intrusive formats, such as telemarketing and SPAM (Non-opt-in email) are towards the bottom of the list in terms of consumer appeal. Print advertising (Newspapers and Magazine) as well as TV and Outdoor advertising rate most positively. What is surprising is the breadth of feelings about different advertising formats. This research shows there is a significant difference between how consumers feel about Mobile ads (70% negative) versus Newspaper ads (9% negative).”

New formats included in the fifth-year survey were online search ads and ads on mobile devices. While initial research focused on measuring the effectiveness of ads on mobile WAP sites indicates that they can be highly effective among certain audiences, this research suggests that consumers may not yet see the value in mobile ads at this stage.

Mobile phones are considered extremely personal to the consumer and the perception may be that ads on mobile phones will be intrusive and interruptive - like SPAM, even more so than telemarketing and non-opt-in emails, according to this ranking. Therefore, there is an opportunity for advertisers and brands to change this perception by connecting with their audience when the message is relevant. It is also likely that many of the people have not yet seen mobile ads, so this perception may vary with exposure.

Online search ads fall among the middle of the list, perhaps because search remains a relatively new ad format compared to Newspaper and TV (where people are trained to expect advertising). Search ads - designed to be informative within an information-seeking environment - tend to strive for relevancy, thus one might expect for that reason alone to see search higher on the list of consumer preference.
Relevancy plays an important part in overall opinions of the ad formats. According to this research, the more relevant people feel the ads are to them, the better their opinions of the medium.

Newspaper, TV and Magazine ads were found to be the most relevant, while ads on mobile devices, non-opt-in emails and Telemarketing were least relevant. To an earlier point, it will be up to mobile advertisers to get creative in terms of technologies and methods to reach a more relevant audience. Surprisingly, even when ranking on relevance, online search ads placed in the middle of the list - perhaps because many consumers do not realise that some of the search results they see are in fact advertising.

Overall, online advertising has fallen slightly compared to its ranking in earlier AdReaction surveys. This may be in part because the Internet still suffers from its history of the early days of online advertising, and people may still associate it with the annoyance of pop-ups and a cluttered media environment. According to this survey, people perceive that the amount of advertising on the Web is increasing.



Over two-thirds (71%) of U.K. respondents said that there are more ads on the Internet compared to the past six months. AdReaction results also reveal much variance in perceptions of online ads when people were asked specifically about formats, such as video and banner ads.
 
Bron: www.dynamiclogic.com, 17 juni 2008

Zie ook: Mediabelevingsonderzoek 2007
 

Meer artikelen

Leesduur anno 2011

Leesduur anno 2011

Het krantlezen is voor veel mensen een dagelijkse, vaste gewoonte. Voor het lezen van een - betaalde - krant trekt een Nederlander doordeweeks dagelijks 30 minuten uit. Er is nauwelijks verschil tussen landelijke en regionale dagbladen. Lees meer >

Cebuco’s Bereiksversterker geactualiseerd

Cebuco’s Bereiksversterker geactualiseerd

On- en ofline bereik dagbladen in een handomdraai berekend. De afgelopen jaren kwamen de digitale uitgaven van dagbladuitgevers in een stroom-versnelling. Maar ook de gedrukte uitgaven blijven in Nederland een dominante rol in het medialandschap spelen. Een goede reden om het gezamenlijke bereik van online en offline dagbladen eens op en rij te zetten. Lees meer >

STIR en NOM publiceren gecombineerd bereik

STIR en NOM publiceren gecombineerd bereik

De Stichting Internetreclame (STIR) en het Nationaal Onderzoek Multimedia (NOM) publiceren binnenkort hun eerste databestand met het gecombineerde bereik van print en online. Daarmee is een langgekoesterde wens in vervulling gegaan, namelijk het inzichtelijk maken van de overlap in het bereik tussen een papieren titel en online titel. Dagbladuitgevers zijn daarmee in staat het totale lezerspubliek te rapporteren van zowel de papieren editie als de online krant. Lees meer >

home sitemap © 2008 - 2012 Cebuco disclaimer